food-thumbnail.png

Packing Peanuts Market Research Report – Segmentation by Product (Starch-based biodegradable peanuts, Expanded polystyrene (EPS) peanuts, Recycled foam peanuts), Application (E-commerce shipments, Industrial protective packaging, Consumer goods packaging, Others), and Region - Size, Share, Growth Analysis | Forecast (2025– 2030)

Packing Peanuts Market​ Size (2025 – 2030)

The Global Packing Peanuts Market was valued at USD 1.05 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 6.8% between 2025 and 2030, reaching roughly USD 1.5 billion by 2030.

Packing peanuts, also called loose-fill, are small, lightweight cushioning pieces used to protect items during shipping and storage. Historically dominated by expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam due to low cost and strong cushioning properties, the market is now seeing a shift as sustainability concerns, e-commerce growth, and regulatory pressures motivate manufacturers and shippers to evaluate alternatives. Key product families include traditional EPS peanuts, starch-based biodegradable peanuts derived from corn or other bio-polymers, and peanuts made from recycled foam. Applications span e-commerce parcel shipments, protective packaging for fragile industrial parts, and cushioning for consumer electronics, glassware, and other goods. Cost sensitivity and performance trade-offs remain central to buying decisions, while innovations in biodegradable formulations and recycling programs influence procurement strategies across retailers, third-party logistics providers, and specialty packagers.

Key market insights:

Expanded polystyrene peanuts still account for a majority of global volume due to low material cost and consistent performance.
Starch-based biodegradable peanuts are the fastest-growing product segment in percentage terms, driven by sustainability commitments and landfill regulations.
E-commerce shipments represent the largest single application by volume, reflecting high parcelization rates and increased consumer returns.
North America holds a strong share of revenue owing to established logistics networks and recycling initiatives, while Asia-Pacific shows the quickest growth in demand.
Waste management policies and single-use plastic restrictions in several regions are accelerating adoption of bio-based loose-fill alternatives.
Suppliers are increasingly offering take-back programs and recycled-content peanuts to address circularity concerns.
Average unit price for biodegradable peanuts is higher than EPS, but total lifecycle cost advantages are often cited by environmentally conscious buyers.

Global Packing Peanuts Market Drivers

E-commerce and DTC packaging expansion is driving the market growth

The rise of online retail and direct-to-consumer (DTC) distribution has fundamentally changed packaging needs. Smaller parcels, higher shipment frequency, and a surge in returns create unprecedented demand for lightweight, flexible cushioning options. Packing peanuts are particularly suited to irregularly shaped items and multi-item packages, providing adaptable void fill without adding significant weight. For many merchants, packing peanuts reduce dimensional packing complexity and can lower breakage rates compared with rigid dividers. Furthermore, the returns economy — where items are often repackaged and shipped multiple times — places a premium on cushioning that can withstand repeated handling. E-commerce fulfillment centers and micro-fulfillment hubs optimize throughput; loose-fill solutions that are quick to apply and inexpensive per unit help maintain productivity. However, retailers are balancing operational speed with brand perception; visible plastic foam in unboxing experiences can undermine sustainability messages. As DTC brands scale, they demand options that align with their marketing narratives, including compostable or plant-based peanuts that can be promoted as part of eco-friendly packaging. Logistics providers are responding by offering mixed packaging assortments and supply agreements that combine cost control with greener choices. In short, the growth and operational realities of e-commerce and DTC shipping create steady baseline demand for packing peanuts while steering product innovation toward convenience and environmental alignment.

Sustainability shift toward biodegradable materials is driving the market growth

Sustainability is reshaping buyer preferences and procurement policies across retail and logistics. Pressure from consumers, corporate sustainability goals, and municipal regulations is prompting brands to reduce single-use plastics and transition to materials that either biodegrade or fit into circular streams. Starch-derived packing peanuts and other bio-based loose-fill products have emerged as viable alternatives; they dissolve in water, are compostable under certain conditions, and avoid persistent microplastics. Corporates with public sustainability targets view biodegradable peanuts as an easy-to-communicate win that can be scaled across thousands of shipments. At the same time, waste management infrastructures are uneven; composting availability, commercial organics programs, and local recycling rules all affect the real-world disposal profile of biodegradable peanuts. Because performance matters, development efforts have focused on ensuring bio-based formulations deliver similar cushioning and abrasion resistance as foam. Additionally, procurement teams conduct lifecycle assessments to compare greenhouse gas impacts, landfill persistence, and end-of-life costs. Packaging engineers are testing hybrid approaches, mixing small amounts of loose-fill with molded pulp or paper cushions to balance protection and sustainability. Finally, regulatory moves to curb single-use polystyrene in some jurisdictions create forward-looking demand as supply chains de-risk future compliance. Collectively, these forces are accelerating investment into biodegradable loose-fill, shifting long-term market composition.

Global Packing Peanuts Market Challenges and Restraints

Cost and performance trade-offs of alternatives is restricting the market growth

A persistent constraint for wider switching to bio-based or recycled packing peanuts is the trade-off between cost and technical performance. Traditional expanded polystyrene has long been favored because of its very low raw material cost, predictable rebound characteristics, and light weight. Alternative materials—starch-based, biodegradable polyesters, or recycled foam—tend to have higher per-unit costs or require adjustments in packaging operations. For companies operating on thin margins or shipping high volumes, even modest per-unit cost increases add up quickly. Moreover, inconsistent supply or variation in bulk density can alter packing density and freight cost calculations. From a performance standpoint, alternatives can differ in static charge behavior, abrasion resistance, and moisture sensitivity, requiring requalification for certain product lines. Some biodegradable variants may compress differently, needing more volume to achieve the same protective effect. These uncertainties can deter procurement teams from changing established packaging bills of materials. To address adoption hurdles, suppliers must either reduce price gaps through scale or provide total-cost-of-ownership models that quantify savings from reduced returns, landfill fees, or brand premium. Until those economic cases are clear and repeatable, the dominance of lower-cost EPS options will persist in many cost-sensitive segments.

Market Opportunities

The packing peanuts market offers multiple clear opportunities for manufacturers, logistics providers, and retailers as packaging priorities shift. First, product innovation that narrows the performance gap between EPS and alternatives can accelerate adoption. Improved bio-polymers and blended formulations can deliver equivalent crush resistance and moisture tolerance while retaining compostability or recyclability, satisfying both protection and sustainability goals. Second, services that simplify transitions for packers—pre-qualification kits, on-site trials, and tailored bill-of-material analyses—help reduce switching friction. Third, circular-model opportunities are significant: take-back programs in which used foam is collected and processed into new loose-fill create closed-loop systems that reduce raw material dependency and appeal to sustainability-focused customers. Fourth, regional manufacturing near large fulfillment hubs reduces freight emissions and cost, creating local value propositions for brands shipping high parcel volumes. Fifth, hybrid packaging systems that combine minimal loose-fill with molded pulp, paper-based wraps, or inflatable cushions can reduce overall material usage while maintaining protection, opening cross-selling opportunities for converters. Sixth, the institutional buyer segment—large retailers and third-party logistics firms—presents scale contracts that can justify investments in new production capacity and certification. Seventh, growth in emerging markets and urban centers increases demand for affordable cushioning; cost-efficient biodegradable options targeted to these regions could capture substantial volume. Finally, marketing and certification play a role: verified environmental claims, QR-code linked disposal instructions, and visible sustainability labeling improve consumer perception and enable brands to command premiums. By addressing performance, logistics, and disposal concerns holistically, suppliers and service providers can expand addressable markets and create sticky customer relationships that go beyond simple commodity sales.

PACKING PEANUTS MARKET REPORT COVERAGE:

REPORT METRIC

DETAILS

Market Size Available

2024 - 2030

Base Year

2024

Forecast Period

2025 - 2030

CAGR

6.8%

Segments Covered

By Material Type,  Application,  Packaging Type, and Region

Various Analyses Covered

Global, Regional & Country Level Analysis, Segment-Level Analysis, DROC, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Landscape, Analyst Overview on Investment Opportunities

Regional Scope

North America, Europe, APAC, Latin America, Middle East & Africa

Key Companies Profiled

Sealed Air, Pregis, Storopack, Ranpak, Intertape Polymer Group,

Packing Peanuts Market Segmentation:

Packing Peanuts Market Segmentation By Material Type:


• Expanded polystyrene (EPS)
• Starch-based biodegradable
• Recycled foam
• Other bio-polymer loose-fill products

Expanded polystyrene (EPS) packing peanuts remain the dominant product due to their cost-effectiveness, predictable cushioning properties, low weight, and established manufacturing base. For many packers, EPS offers the lowest per-shipment cost and reliable performance across a wide range of goods and shipment scenarios. It also integrates easily into existing packaging lines without the need for equipment updates. Despite environmental concerns, EPS’s operational advantages and long history of use ensure its continued prevalence, particularly where buyers prioritize immediate unit-cost savings and consistent protection metrics over longer-term disposal impacts. Incremental adoption of alternatives will be driven by regulation and corporate sustainability investments, but EPS’s entrenched position will sustain substantial volume through 2030.

Packing Peanuts Market Segmentation By Application:


• E-commerce shipments and parcel delivery
• Industrial protective packaging and parts shipping
• Consumer goods and electronics packaging
• Retail packing and warehousing
• Others (medical devices, antiques, glassware)


E-commerce shipments dominate packing peanut usage because of high parcel volumes, diverse product sizes, and the prevalence of small, irregularly shaped items that benefit from loose-fill cushioning. E-commerce fulfillment requires fast, adaptable materials that can be applied quickly by seasonal labor and automated dispensers, and packing peanuts meet this need cost-effectively. Additionally, the high rate of returns in online retail increases the need for resilient cushioning that protects goods through multiple transit cycles. As online retail continues to grow and diversify its SKU base, the e-commerce application will drive the largest and most consistent demand for packing peanuts worldwide.

Packing Peanuts Market Regional Segmentation:

• North America
• Asia-Pacific
• Europe
• South America
• Middle East and Africa


North America is the dominant region for packing peanuts due to its mature e-commerce market, high fulfillment center density, and established recycling programs in many jurisdictions. Major retailers and third-party logistics operators headquartered in the region have historically driven demand for cost-effective, high-throughput cushioning for domestic and cross-border parcel flows. The presence of extensive conversion and manufacturing capacity—often located near distribution hubs—lowers lead times and supports rapid responsiveness to seasonal surges. In addition, North American procurement teams increasingly adopt sustainability criteria and supplier scorecards, incentivizing a parallel market for biodegradable and recycled loose-fill solutions. Meanwhile, robust waste infrastructure in several states enables pilot take-back and recycling programs that validate circular-business models. The combination of high parcelization rates, strong logistics networks, technology-driven fulfillment strategies, and early corporate sustainability adoption gives North America both the volume and the economic conditions that support a diverse packing peanuts market. While Asia-Pacific shows rapid growth from expanding e-commerce and manufacturing bases, North America’s installed base and consumers’ high expectations for damage-free delivery keep it at the lead in overall market revenues and innovation adoption through 2030.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis on the Packing Peanuts Market

The COVID-19 pandemic acted as both a shock and an accelerant for packing peanuts demand and market evolution. Lockdowns and social distancing drove an abrupt shift from brick-and-mortar to online shopping, dramatically increasing parcel volumes and the immediate need for cushioning materials suitable for rapid packing operations. Fulfillment centers prioritized throughput, and lightweight loose-fill that sped packaging processes became a practical choice. Conversely, early pandemic supply chain disruptions highlighted vulnerabilities: raw material shortages, production slowdowns, and shipping delays created temporary shortages and forced buyers to test alternative cushioning materials. The pandemic also sharpened environmental attention; consumers confronted with more delivery waste began to press brands on sustainable packaging, accelerating pilots for biodegradable peanuts and take-back schemes. Operationally, labor constraints and sanitary concerns favored loose-fill that minimized close-contact handling and could be dispensed rapidly without complex machinery. Post-pandemic, many of those changed behaviors stuck: e-commerce volumes settled at higher baselines than pre-2020, suppliers diversified sourcing, and buyers formalized sustainability commitments that were once optional. Investments in local production near major fulfillment hubs rose to reduce transport risk, and packaging engineers explored hybrid solutions that reduced material usage while retaining protection. Thus, COVID-19 compressed several years of packaging evolution into a short period, expanding the market while simultaneously forcing strategic shifts toward resilience and greener alternatives that will define the sector through the 2025–2030 forecast window.

Latest trends/Developments

Several notable developments are shaping the packing peanuts market today. First, growth in biodegradable, starch-based loose-fill is one of the most visible trends as brands seek tangible sustainability changes; suppliers are improving formulations to match EPS performance. Second, circular economy initiatives—take-back, reprocessing, and recycled-content peanuts—are gaining traction among retailers and logistics firms aiming to close material loops. Third, hybrid packaging approaches that combine minimal loose-fill with molded pulp or paper-based inserts help reduce total material use while protecting items effectively. Fourth, automation in fulfillment centers is influencing material choice; dispensers and applicators are tuned to specific bulk densities and flow characteristics, creating product design opportunities for manufacturers. Fifth, regionalization of production—locating conversion near large fulfillment hubs—reduces lead times and transport emissions, supporting demand for locally sourced alternatives. Sixth, consumer-facing transparency is increasing: brands communicate disposal instructions and compostability claims through on-package labeling and digital assets. Seventh, regulatory activity targeting single-use foams in certain markets is accelerating qualification of alternatives and bolstering long-term demand for biodegradable peanuts. Eighth, performance testing standards and third-party certifications are becoming more common, helping procurement teams validate new materials. Finally, innovation at the chemistry level—blending bio-based polymers with recycled modifiers—promises to narrow cost and performance gaps. Collectively, these trends move the market toward a more diversified product mix where sustainability, supply resilience, and integration with automated operations determine winners.

Key Players:

  1. Sealed Air
  2. Pregis
  3. Storopack
  4. Ranpak
  5. Intertape Polymer Group
  6. DS Smith
  7. Sonoco Products Company
  8. Berry Global
  9. Smurfit Kappa
  10. Knauf Industries

Chapter 1. Packing Peanuts  Market – SCOPE & METHODOLOGY
   1.1. Market Segmentation
   1.2. Scope, Assumptions & Limitations
   1.3. Research Methodology
   1.4. Primary Sources.
   1.5. Secondary Sources
 Chapter 2. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  2.1. Market Size & Forecast – (2025 – 2030) ($M/$Bn)
  2.2. Key Trends & Insights
              2.2.1. Demand Side
              2.2.2. Supply Side     
   2.3. Attractive Investment Propositions
   2.4. COVID-19 Impact Analysis
 Chapter 3. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET  – COMPETITION SCENARIO
   3.1. Market Share Analysis & Company Benchmarking
   3.2. Competitive Strategy & Development Scenario
   3.3. Competitive Pricing Analysis
   3.4. Supplier-Distributor Analysis
 Chapter 4. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET - ENTRY SCENARIO
4.1. Regulatory Scenario
4.2. Case Studies – Key Start-ups
4.3. Customer Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Porters Five Force Model
               4.5.1. Bargaining Packing Peanuts  of Suppliers
               4.5.2. Bargaining Risk Analytics s of Customers
               4.5.3. Threat of New Entrants
               4.5.4. Rivalry among Existing Players
               4.5.5. Threat of Substitutes Players
                4.5.6. Threat of Substitutes 
 Chapter 5. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET - LANDSCAPE
   5.1. Value Chain Analysis – Key Stakeholders Impact Analysis
   5.2. Market Drivers
   5.3. Market Restraints/Challenges
   5.4. Market Opportunities
Chapter 6. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET  – By Material Type 
6.1    Introduction/Key Findings   
6.2    Expanded polystyrene (EPS) 
6.3    Starch-based biodegradable 
6.4    Recycled foam 
6.5    Other bio-polymer loose-fill products  
6.6    Y-O-Y Growth trend Analysis By Material Type 
6.7    Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Material Type , 2025-2030
 
Chapter 7. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET  – By Application 
7.1    Introduction/Key Findings   
7.2    E-commerce shipments and parcel delivery
7.3    Industrial protective packaging and parts shipping
7.4    Consumer goods and electronics packaging
7.5    Retail packing and warehousing
7.6     Others (medical devices, antiques, glassware)
7.7    Y-O-Y Growth  trend Analysis By Application 
7.8    Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Application , 2025-2030
 
Chapter 8. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET - By Geography – Market Size, Forecast, Trends & Insights
8.1. North America
                                8.1.1. By Country
                                                8.1.1.1. U.S.A.
                                                8.1.1.2. Canada
                                                8.1.1.3. Mexico
                                8.1.2. By Application 
                                8.1.3. By Material Type 
                                8.1.4. Countries & Segments - Market Attractiveness Analysis
   8.2. Europe
                                8.2.1. By Country
                                                8.2.1.1. U.K.                         
                                                8.2.1.2. Germany
                                                8.2.1.3. France
                                                8.2.1.4. Italy
                                                8.2.1.5. Spain
                                                8.2.1.6. Rest of Europe
                                8.2.2. By Material Type 
                                8.2.3. By Application 
                                8.2.4. Countries & Segments - Market Attractiveness Analysis
8.3. Asia Pacific
                                8.3.1. By Country
                                                8.3.1.1. China
                                                8.3.1.2. Japan
                                                8.3.1.3. South Korea
                                                8.3.1.4. India      
                                                8.3.1.5. Australia & New Zealand
                                                8.3.1.6. Rest of Asia-Pacific
                                8.3.2. By Material Type 
                                8.3.3. By Application 
                                8.3.4. Countries & Segments - Market Attractiveness Analysis
8.4. South America
                                8.4.1. By Country
                                                8.4.1.1. Brazil
                                                8.4.1.2. Argentina
                                                8.4.1.3. Colombia
                                                8.4.1.4. Chile
                                                8.4.1.5. Rest of South America
                                8.4.2.  By Material Type 
                                8.4.3. By Application 
                                8.4.4. Countries & Segments - Market Attractiveness Analysis
8.5. Middle East & Africa
                                8.5.1. By Country
                                                8.5.1.1. United Arab Emirates (UAE)
                                                8.5.1.2. Saudi Arabia
                                                8.5.1.3. Qatar
                                                8.5.1.4. Israel
                                                8.5.1.5. South Africa
                                                8.5.1.6. Nigeria
                                                8.5.1.7. Kenya
                                                8.5.1.8. Egypt
                                                8.5.1.8. Rest of MEA
                              8.5.2. By Material Type 
                             8.5.3. By Application 
                             8.5.4. Countries & Segments - Market Attractiveness Analysis
 
Chapter 9. PACKING PEANUTS  MARKET – Company Profiles – (Overview, Material Type  Portfolio, Financials, Strategies & Developments)

9.1    Sealed Air
9.2    Pregis
9.3    Storopack
9.4    Ranpak
9.5    Intertape Polymer Group
9.6    DS Smith
9.7    Sonoco Products Company
9.8    Berry Global
9.9    Smurfit Kappa
9.10    Knauf Industries

Download Sample

The field with (*) is required.

Choose License Type

$

2500

$

4250

$

5250

$

6900

Frequently Asked Questions

The market was valued around USD 1.05 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach about USD 1.5 billion by 2030.

Primary drivers include e-commerce growth, sustainability pressure favoring bio-based alternatives, and regulatory quality assurance requirements.

By product: EPS, starch-based biodegradable, recycled foam, and other bio-polymers. By application: e-commerce, industrial protective packaging, consumer goods, and others.

North America leads due to high e-commerce parcel volumes, dense fulfillment infrastructure, and active sustainability pilots.

Leading suppliers include Sealed Air, Pregis, Storopack, Ranpak, Intertape Polymer Group, and others listed above.

Analyst Support

Every order comes with Analyst Support.

Customization

We offer customization to cater your needs to fullest.

Verified Analysis

We value integrity, quality and authenticity the most.