Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Size (2025-2030)

The Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market was valued at USD 1.5 billion and is projected to reach a market size of USD 2.8 billion by the end of 2030. Over the forecast period of 2025-2030, the market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 13.3%. 

From 2025 to 2030, the worldwide Genetically Modified (GM) food safety testing market is expected to show major expansion. Rising consumer awareness of food safety, tight regulations, and genetically modified organisms becoming more frequent in the food supply chain drive this market growth. Further stressing the need for strong Genetically Modified (GM) food safety testing procedures are developments in testing methods and the worldwide food trade.

Key Market Insights:

• Consumer awareness of the existence of GMOs in their food is driving demand for honest labeling and thorough safety evaluations.
• To safeguard public health and safety, governments all over the world are enforcing rigorous rules requiring the thorough testing of genetically modified (GM) foods.
• Testing techniques, including real-time polymer chain reaction (PCR) and immunoassays, have improved the precision and speed of genetically modified (GM) food safety testing.
• Standardized testing procedures are needed to track and manage the migration of genetically modified organisms across frontiers resulting from the international trade of foods.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Drivers:

Concerns related to the safety and health risks that are associated with GM foods have resulted in the strict testing of GM food samples.

Strict safety inspections and testing in response to likely health hazards related to genetically modified foods—such as allergenicity and gene transfer—have been completed. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U. S. Working together, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) helps to monitor GMOs to make sure that GM foods correspond to the same safety levels as their traditional equivalents. The FDA enforces food safety rules, the EPA controls chemicals defending GMO plants, and the USDA&'s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) makes sure that GM plants do not damage other plants.

Thorough rules and regulations are the key market drivers.

Producers are forced to provide their goods with very detailed GM testing if they are to meet worldwide food safety norms and help trade. Producers have to perform thorough GM testing of their goods to conform with worldwide food safety norms and support international commerce. Codex Alimentarius Commission rules, among others, recommend that nations coordinate their safety assessment procedures for GM foods. Using this harmonization, the risk of variations in product approvals among countries is lessened, hence facilitating more congenial trade relations.

Rising consumer demand for the products is leading to market growth, posing as another important market driver.

Consumers' increasing preference for non-GMO goods is driving producers under stress to check and properly brand their products. This tendency drives manufacturers to examine and precisely label their products to fulfill client expectations. With predictions pointing to a steady upward trend, the non-GMO food market has seen significant expansion. This demand, driven by factors including health awareness and concerns about sustainability, results in a more general availability of non-GMO goods in the market.

Recent Advancements in Genetic Modification Technologies are the reason behind the development of new genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

New genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been made possible by breakthroughs in genetic engineering, such as CRISPR and other genome-editing techniques. Such developments call for thorough safety controls to guarantee adherence to changing rules and to deal with consumer worries regarding the safety of GM foods.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Restraints and Challenges:

The high testing cost of advanced testing technologies presents a market challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as it is difficult for them to afford it.

Small to medium-sized food companies in the financial industry can find advanced testing technologies costly, therefore limiting their use. Accurate GMO detection and counting of food products depend on sophisticated GM food testing methods, including quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). Still, the effective use of these advanced techniques calls for significant financial investment in specialized equipment, reagents, and trained staff. These expenses could be prohibitive for small to medium-sized enterprises working on tight budgets since they impede their capacity to satisfy legal standards and effectively compete in the industry. The GM food safety testing sector's overall expansion may be hampered if small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have limited market engagement due to this financial obstacle.

The technical complexities faced by the market are another huge challenge for the market.

Looking for GMOs in extremely processed products can be difficult since DNA or protein fragments could degrade during processing, thereby complicating testing techniques. The deterioration of DNA or protein molecules throughout processing presents technical difficulties in determining GMOs in very processed food products. Chemical treatments, refining, and heating are all processes that can destroy genetic material, thereby complicating the precise identification and measurement of GMOs. For example, refined products like oils made from GM plants and sugar may have little or no visible genetic material, hence complicating the examination. This decline calls for the creation of more sensitive and reliable testing techniques able to pick up trace quantities of GMOs in processed foods, which will serve to increase testing complexity and expenses further.

Lack of standardization due to varying rules and regulations along with varying testing standards is a major market challenge faced by the GM Food Testing Market.

Different countries' variations in testing criteria and legal expectations can cause discrepancies and impede worldwide commerce. Different countries have variations in testing methods and compliance standards for genetically modified organisms due to the lack of standardized world rules and criteria. For instance, while some areas may have more lenient rules, the European Union requires strict standards for the thorough testing and labeling of GM foods. As goods considered legal in one country might not meet the regulatory requirements of another, creating trade obstacles, testing demands for exporters, and possibly market access problems would rise. For businesses trying to follow regulations in many places, the absence of standardization makes international trade more difficult.

Public perception and their having issues in accepting genetically modified (GM) food is a main challenge for the market.

Public doubts and unfavorable views remain even notwithstanding the scientific agreement on the safety of GM food. The resistance of society can affect market forces and government regulations, therefore challenging the adoption and testing of genetically modified foodstuffs. This societal resistance can influence market dynamics, causing more need for non-GMO goods and stiffer rules. Consumer worries can drive companies to do thorough testing and honest labeling, which would lower operational expenses and affect product development plans. Public opposition might also discourage spending on GM technologies and slow down innovation within the sector.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Opportunities:

The development of cost-effective testing methods presents a great opportunity for the GM Food Safety Testing Market to grow.

Funding studies to develop cheap and effective testing methods can help all food companies access GM food safety testing. Improvements in testing methods are helping GM food safety evaluations become more available and cost-effective. Inventions such as real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests have simplified the detection process, hence lowering both money and time. For example, TÜV SÜD uses cutting-edge screening techniques that provide a cost-efficient means of uncovering approved or unauthorized GMOs, therefore allowing even small to medium-sized firms (SMEs) to ensure food safety standards are met.

The growing demand for genetically modified (GM) food in developing nations is a major opportunity for the market to expand in these areas.

The rising need for genetically modified (GM) food testing in developing countries results from improvements in their food safety standards. The need for GM food testing services is rising as developing nations improve their food safety criteria. Rising awareness of food safety among customers, coupled with changes in regulations, are said to be driving forces behind this phenomenon. Companies like Eurofins have extended their offerings worldwide to provide thorough GMO identification and certification solutions that help producers to fulfill local as well as worldwide government standards.

The integration of blockchain technology helps in streamlining the whole testing process, giving an opportunity to the market to grow further.

Using blockchain for traceability can streamline the testing process and guarantee the validity of non-GMO claims. Blockchain technology is transforming the traceability of the food supply chain by giving clear and unchangeable records of product paths from farm to fork. This combination simplifies the testing process and guarantees the genuineness of non-GMO assertions. Blockchain's intrinsic characteristics provide a reliable system for food product monitoring, so increasing visibility and responsibility along the food supply chain, a systematic review noted.

The partnership between the public and private sectors has helped the genetically modified (GM) food market to grow.

Standardized testing methods can be developed, and worldwide food safety can be promoted through partnerships among governments, industrial actors, and research organizations. Government agencies working in tandem with industry players and research organizations are key for the improvement of standardized testing techniques and the support of world food safety. Working closely with several industries to guarantee items meet legal and consumer expectations, businesses such Intertek provide thorough GMO detection services as well as certification courses. Such collaborations help to streamline testing standards, lower commercial roadblocks, and increase consumer trust of GM food products.

GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD SAFETY TESTING MARKET REPORT COVERAGE:

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation:

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation: By Trait

• Stacked
• Herbicide Tolerance
• Insect Resistance

Stacked traits are now the dominant segment in the market for the safety testing of genetically modified (GM) food. The combination of many features in one crop improves its appeal to farmers, therefore driving widespread adoption and hence raising test needs. Stacked trait is also defined as the fastest-growing segment. The constant innovation in biotechnology allows crops with several desirable features to be developed, therefore fueling demand for thorough safety assessment policies.

Stacked trait includes the combining of several genetic changes in one organism, such as resistance to both herbicides and insects. This approach has many advantages since it makes crops more robust and lowers the demand for chemical treatments.

Herbicide Tolerance is the crop that is designed to resist particular herbicides, enabling farmers to manage weeds without damage to the main crop.

Insect Resistance: These crops lower the use of chemical pesticides by generating compounds poisonous to particular species.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation: By Technology

• Polymerase Chain Reaction
• Immunoassay

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is the dominant segment. GM food safety testing relies mostly on PCR-based methods. Testing labs mostly choose them for their sensitivity, accuracy, and ability to quantify GM content. Ongoing developments that raise effectiveness and lower costs have made PCR technology the fastest-growing segment, too, hence bolstering its marketplace.

One may identify and measure GMOs with great specificity and sensitivity using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a molecular approach that multiplies DNA sequences.

The immunoassay method uses antibodies to identify particular proteins produced by transgenic organisms. An immunoassay is what it is. Although it is inexpensive and produces quick results, it is usually less sensitive than PCR and may miss all GM events, especially those including unknown or novel proteins.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation: By Crop Tested

• Corn
• Soybean
• Rapeseed/Canola
• Potato

Corn is the dominant segment in the market that is used for testing the crop for GM modification. Its widespread application in animal feed and food ingredients calls for strict testing to meet regulatory requirements and answer customer issues.

Soybean is the fastest-growing segment. Soybean testing is going through a great expansion. Driven by demand in food and industrial uses, the rising adoption of GM soybean varieties stresses the need for thorough safety evaluations.

Corn is conceptualized using great modification for characteristics such as pest resistance and herbicide tolerance.

Soybean is often modified for herbicide resistance, soybeans are a staple in many commercial food products and animal feed.

Derived from rapeseed, canola oil is a commonly consumed edible oil transformed mostly for herbicide resistance.

With potatoes, genetic changes frequently seek to lessen bruising and increase pest and disease resistance.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation: By Processed Food Tested

• Bakery and Confectionery
• Meat and Meat Products
• Breakfast Cereals and Snacks
• Food Additives

The breakfast cereals and snacks segment is both the dominant and fastest-growing segment. The frequency of GM components in these items, along with rising consumer demand for transparency, drives the need for strict testing methods.

Corn syrup or soy lecithin, for instance, may be found in items in the bakery and confectionery segment.

Although meat itself is not genetically modified, animals could be fed GM plants, so meat products would have to be tested.

Breakfast cereal and snacks are made usually from GM grains like corn and soy.

Food additives derived from GM sources are emulsifiers, flavor enhancers, and preservatives.

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Segmentation: By Region

• North America
• Asia-Pacific
• Europe
• South America
• Middle East and Africa

North America leads this market due to increased consumer awareness and strong rules and regulations, followed by Europe. Asia-Pacific is seen as the fastest-growing region in this market due to enhanced food safety standards. Whereas, South America and MEA regions are marked by slow growth in the market, although awareness regarding food safety issues is on the rise.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis on the Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market:

The worldwide food supply networks were disturbed by the COVID-19 epidemic, therefore underlining weaknesses in systems of quality control and food safety. Although the first concern was managing the epidemic, the crisis highlighted the need for thorough food safety testing—including GM food testing—to avert possible health hazards. Investing more in fortifying food safety systems and setting more strict testing standards to guarantee the flexibility of food systems against the next shocks is expected post-pandemic.

Latest Trends/ Developments:

Rapid analysis and interpretation of complicated data sets are made possible by AI-driven tools that also help to improve the accuracy and efficiency of genetically modified (GM) food safety testing.

Rising consumer awareness and the creation of rigorous food safety laws are driving the growing use of GM food safety testing standards in developing areas.

Non-invasive testing methods provide for real-time monitoring of GM foods free of effect on product integrity, enabling constant quality control along the supply chain.

Through NGS's thorough examination of GMOs, unknown and unapproved genetic alterations can be identified; therefore, testing precision is improved.

Key Players:

1. Intertek Group Plc
2. SGS S.A.
3. Eurofins Scientific SE
4. TUV SUD AG
5. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
6. Bureau Veritas S.A.
7. Arbro Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
8. Romer Labs Division Holding GmbH
9. Microbac Laboritories, Inc.